There are people out there in the world who look down on digital art as though it’s somehow “cheating” and not real art. When I tell them I create my paintings on a computer, they do their best to hide their disdain. But I can tell.
I have friends who are artists, and I know they think my art is not legitimate. How do I know? Because they never ask me about it. I think if they thought it was “real” art, they’d be interested. But they don’t ask. Ever. I’m not exactly sure why, but I suspect to their minds, if they were to show interest it would somehow legitimize a form of art they feel lacks authenticity.
To be clear, I don’t think digital art should command the same dollar value as traditional art. Obviously, something that can so easily be reproduced is not as valuable as a one of a kind, done-by-hand painting. But that’s not what I’m talking about.
Art is not about a dollar value, it’s about the act of creation. My digital paintings are as legitimately “art” as a Rembrandt self portrait. I am NOT saying they are as valuable. I am NOT saying they are historically significant. What I AM saying is that both are legitimate artistic human expressions.
Human expression. That’s what art consists of – whether created with a finger, a brush, or an electronic stylus.
Almost Daily: Art, Dogs, and cranky dispatches from an absurd Universe.
Almost Daily is a blog by Steve Merryman, who is not all that impressed with you or your full, luxurious head of hair. Isolated in the hills in the furthest reaches of Eastern Washington (USA), Steve is often left alone with his thoughts, which, frankly, are better company but don’t help out around the house. He writes about things that make him tick, and things that tick him off. Given his irascible nature, sometimes even he can’t tell the difference between the two.
Share or don't. I care not.